Answer:
To reduce soft money contributions to political parties.
it has caused spending by interest groups to increase
Explanation:
giving money to political campaigns is considered free speech:
in "citizen united v fec" the supreme court said because corporations giving money to political campaigns is considered free speech and the government cant restrict it. giving money is protected under the first amendment
Soft money is unregulated donations to political parties for general "party-building" purposes, not the support of a particular candidate so it avoid various legal limitations
Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act aka McCain-Feingold Act is a major amendment of the Federal Election Campaign Act 1971 passed by the US congress in 2002. Its goal was to reduce the increased use of soft money to fund advertising by political parties.
brainly.com/question/11364371
investopedia
wikipedia
Answer: They do this by providing more candidates from which a voter can choose.
Explanation:
There are several minor political parties in the United States. The main two that is heard about more often is the Democrats and Republicans. Other parties are Libertarian and Independent. There is also an option for voters to write in a candidate on any ballot in an official election.
By having numerous choices in an election, this balances out the main group and lets the voters have discussions about issues that are concerning to them. Many of the third party choices do support the wealthiest candidate if they drop out of the race.
Answer:
The 36°30' North line is the line of latitude that was agreed in the Missouri Compromise to determine the slave status of new states to be admitted into the Union, west of the Mississippi River. States south of the line would be considered slave states and north would be free states.
States today that would be south of the line;
- Oklahoma
- Arizona
- New Mexico
States today that would be north of the line;
Is that a question? If it is a true or false question, I believe it is true
