Research examining the link between childhood abuse and antisocial personality disorder has found that <u>factors unrelated to child abuse might play a role in the appearance of antisocial personality disorder.</u>
Antisocial personality disorder (ASPD) is a condition in which the attitudes, habits and behaviors of a person diverge significantly from and often clash with the norms of her society. Upto 4 percent of people in the United States are estimated to have ASPD.
People with ASPD tend to display a lack of empathy and disregard for others, even to the extent of harming them. They tend to violate societal norms and laws. A high percentage of incarcerated violent offenders happen to have ASPD.
While childhood abuse is considered to be a dominant cause of ASPD, research has pointed to other causes as well, including genetics, poverty, and conflicts in the family in which they grew up.
To learn more about Antisocial personality disorder (ASPD): brainly.com/question/4031840
#SPJ4
I really agree with your statement
This is an example of recency and primacy bias.
Explanation:
What happened to Terrence is a pretty common occurrence to people who tend to remember things on a list with some form of difficulty as they usually only retain the things in the first part or the end of the list they are being narrated.
This is due to the attention spans of the people who are receiving the information from the other person.
When the person only remembers the first part of any information they are paying more attention in the beginning and this is known as primacy bias.
When the person only retains what they heard the last it is known as recency bias
The answer is "Neuroticism".
In psychology, Neuroticism is one of the Big Five higher-arrange identity traits. People who score high on neuroticism are more probable than normal to be ill humored and to experience such emotions as tension, stress, fear, outrage, dissatisfaction, begrudge, envy, blame, discouraged inclination, and depression.
Answer:
The threat to internal validity most likely to account for this change is <u>History</u>.
Explanation:
To understad the threats to internal validity during this research, the element that has to be considerate this case is history. The event in time that occure during the experiment, was the rising of the price of gasoline per gallon. Since the research had to do with determining attitudes toward the use of alternative energy, this event of the rising of the gasoline price, is a factor that may affect the validity of the investigation. Since this can defenetly modify the real position or previews position of the subjects towards the use of alternative energy. This specific aspect definetly changes the pretests done by the researcher.
