All categories

3 years ago

PLEASE HELP ME ASAP!!!!! ):

1 answer:

5 0

The Banking services board is not an example of the expansion of the federal government during World War I World War I

<u>Explanation: </u>

World War 1 was a time of tremendous national expansion, and a phase of state prosperity is also called as the New Deal. The era since, though, the 1920s is often described as a time of restraint.

During the participation of the United States in World War I, the United States food Management is essential for the management of the American Armed Forces and its food supplies.

The War industry board (WIB) was developed by the US government department for the purchase and supply of military supplies between the Agency of War (Army Dept) and the Navy Department on 28 July 1917, in the course of World War I.

The Railway Administration was a direct reference to the Railway's inability to create a co-ordinated ' railway system ' for World War I emergencies in April 1917 by Railways ' managers.

You might be interested in

How did colonization expand markets for European powers?

elena-14-01-66 [18.8K]

Answer:

Each person in a conquered region was also a potential customer

Explanation:

The colonization gave the European colonial powers great advantage and opportunity to get a lot of wealth. The reason for this was that they were able to get the natural resources and raw materials from their colonies for free. They had well established manufacturing plants, so they were manufacturing the natural resources and raw materials and turning them into final products. Then they used the people in their colonies to make more profit by selling them the manufactured goods. This worked perfectly well for the colonial powers, as they were the ones that had the industry and the materials to produce, while the people in the colonies where reliant on them for goods as they did not had anything to be able to compete with it.

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

It could be said that “History is what the present chooses to remember about

Masja [62]

Since we don't know which movie is being referred to, let's talk generally about the relationship between history and cinema.

The present influences every historical production. There is an influence of the present on historiographical works -- that is, history produced by and for historians, academics -- as there is on movies, fiction books, tv series, etc.

However, historians are aware of this since the first moment of their studies, so they are trained to seek detachment from the present in order to avoid a biased view of the past. But the present is always a strong force and neutrality is impossible. Thus the most plausible way to follow on historical research is to make clear how the present shows in the work, how it guided questions, and turn it into a tool to understand the past.

When we talk about a movie this is different. A historical movie is a different kind of medium -- it's not a paper published after other historians' approval -- and has a different kind of audience than historical research. So it doesn't have the same space to make it explicitly clear how the present influences it; it can not put a footnote when it's portraying historical events and figures so the viewer can check things on his/her own. When we watch a movie we don't have access to sources utilized and on which historiographical line the movie production based its story.

Following from this, basically, you have three possible conclusions:

1) Movies don't improve the viewer's understanding because it is difficult to check if the movie production utilized reliable sources and bibliography. It could portray historical events with absurd analysis, make whopping anachronisms, which doesn't lead to a qualified understanding of history.

2) Movies improve the viewer's understanding of history because, despite analytical errors and anachronisms, it contributes to spread knowledge about the past that can be later improved through qualified studying by the viewer. It can be said movies have an important role in disseminating a historical culture that can be healthy for societies.

3) Movies can improve as much as they can damage serious historical knowledge and the understanding of history. If they are based on qualified historiography they can be important diffusers of a healthy historical culture that helps society to think and rethink its past, present, and future. However, if they spread poor historical knowledge, they can make it hard for good quality history to gain headway.

3 0

3 years ago

Describe the whiskey rebellion. and the government's action in response to it

Andrews [41]

The Whiskey Rebellion was over the federal government's tax on whiskey in the United States beginning in 1791. The federal government response was initially weak in that they did little to stop the persecution of the tax collectors, however soon Washington's administration called upon the armed militia to put down the protests.

4 0

4 years ago

Is this good for my project about the salamis war?

Mariulka [41]

Yes, but please explain more so i can help you

5 0

4 years ago

What effects did the introduction of mechanical farming equipment have on some rural areas ?

Bumek [7]

The effects that the introduction of mechanical farming equipment had on rural areas were highly positive. It brought a great increase in the farm productivity.

Mechanical farming is the utilization of mechanised agricultural machinery in replacement of manual or animal labour. It made it possible to plant and harvest much larger areas at a much faster speed rate, with the lowest cost of production.

Before Mechanical farming, farmers had to manually plant and harvest their crops. Sometimes they used the help of the animals. Some of the tools they used to use were pitchforks and ploughs.

The Industrial Revolution, which took place between 1760 and 1820, allowed farming and agriculture to be much less labour-intensive processes. Some of the new tools that farmers began to use were the tractors, trucks, combine harvesters, and even aeroplanes for crop dusting.

All of these advances in technology helped make so much produce that it generated a surplus. There were excessive amounts of produce, higher than the amount that the population could consume. As a result of this, the goods began to be exported in international trade to other countries, and created commercial relationships among the countries involved. This, of course, had a positive impact on the exporting country's economy.

To summarize, the introduction of new technology and machinery for agriculture and farming, not only helped make the work less brutal for the farmers and animals, but also had a huge and positive impact on the economy. Social and economic changes were associated with this new way of farming.

4 0

3 years ago