Answer:
b. The refusal has an anti competitive effect on the market.
Explanation:
When a company that sells certain products fails to sell same to a retailer who deals in same products, such is said to have anti competitive effect on the market. The aim is to reduce competition in the market.
This type of refusal would always lead to price fixing, boycott.etc. When there is price fixing, it would lead to customers being unable to buy the product due to high price.
Products that are evenly distributed and not selective would increase competition in the market place such that customers would be able to purchase such product in any retail shop that sells the products.
Answer:
C. The coupon rate on these bonds would have been higher if Standard and Poor's, Moody's, and Fitch had assigned lower credit ratings
Explanation:
Assume that in January 2017, Vivendi announced a €1.2 billion bond issuance. The bonds have a coupon rate of 6.75% payable semiannually. Assume the bonds have been assigned credit ratings of BBB (stable outlook) by Standard and Poor's, Baa2 (stable outlook) by Moody's, and BBB (stable outlook) by Fitch.
Which of the following is not true? The coupon rate on these bonds would have been higher if Standard and Poor's, Moody's, and Fitch had assigned lower credit ratings.
Answer:
$35,860
Explanation:
The computation of the ending inventory using the retail inventory method is shown below
Particulars Cost Retail
Opening Inventory(A) $63,800 $128,400
Purchases(B) $115,060 $196,800
Goods available
C=(A-B) $178,860 $325,200
Cost ratio
($178,860 ÷ $325,200 × 100) 55%
Sales at retail (D) $260,000
End, Inventory at Retail $65,200
($325,200 - $260,000)
End, Inventory at Cost $35,860
($65,200 × 55%)
Answer:
Answer is explained in the explanation section.
Explanation:
If the wages of the Hispanics construction worker in America are less then, they will not have near as much money to send home to their relatives back in Mexico.
And if their families do not have as much as it use to be then they will not be able to buy near as much as they used to.
It means that if the construction workers don't get as much money as they used to then, neither they nor their families will be able to spend as much as they use to which will obviously hurt each of their economies.
