1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
enyata [817]
4 years ago
6

Book Review

English
1 answer:
arsen [322]4 years ago
6 0

Answer:

sorry this isnt everything you asked for but i hope this helps

Explanation:

Frances Eliza Hodgson was born in Manchester, England, on November 24th, 1849. She was the daughter of an ironmonger, who died only three years after her birth. ances alternated between living in Britain and in the United States. She wrote three very popular children's books. Little Lord Fauntleroy was published in 1886, The Little Princess appeared in 1905, and The Secret Garden was published in 1911. Frances wrote successful books for adults as well as children and also wrote plays. She died in 1924 while she was in her Long Island home in New York.

The Secret Garden is about a particularly arrogant and unpleasant girl called Mary Lennox. At the start of the book, she lives in India, but is forced to leave for her uncle's mansion in England in order to escape a devastating outbreak of cholera. The book is about how the discovery of a secret garden transforms the character of Mary and another character in the book. I really liked the book, as it was fascinating to see Mary change from a horrible, spoiled brat to a sweet-hearted girl. The best scene was probably when Mary first finds the garden that was hidden for a decade, as the description left such a clear image in my mind.

You might be interested in
No Compromise with the Evil of Slavery” by William Lloyd Garrison. How are the writer’s arguments in the two excerpts different?
soldi70 [24.7K]

Answer: The right answer is the C) The first excerpt makes a logical appeal, while the second excerpt makes an emotional appeal.

Explanation: Just to elaborate a little on the answer, it can be added that in the first excerpt the author is using a very forceful piece of evidence - a passage from the Declaration of Independence - to support his claim and convince his audience to do the same. However, in the second excerpt he is trying to get an emotional reaction from his readers by addressing them very passionately, boldly and persuasively. He is willing to reject the Declaration of Independence and to burn it, and he goes as far as to refer to slave owners as beasts or animals - those "other men" that "choose to go upon all fours." Furthermore, he is also willing to accuse "this nation" (and those are many people) of falsifying God's principles if they denounce him for following His example, and that must have been a very grave accusation at that time when he penned this terrific speech (1854).  

4 0
3 years ago
Select the correct answer.
koban [17]

Answer:

C

Explanation:

I got it right on a quiz

5 0
4 years ago
In November 1964, after a six-month trial, Lenny Bruce was found guilty of obscenity by the state of New
QveST [7]

Answer:

Governor Pataki implied that Lenny Bruce should not have <u>been found guilty</u><u>.</u>

<u />

Explanation:

By pardoning Lenny Bruce, Governor George Pataki implied that Bruce should not have been found guilty. All Bruce did was use profane language during a stand-up comedy routine. That wasn't something he should've been sentenced for, and Pataki realizes that. The First Amendment guarantees the freedom of speech, and by sentencing Bruce to imprisonment for obscene language, the judge violated that right.

4 0
3 years ago
How far should scientists go to modify humans through genetic engineering
postnew [5]

This is a question of morals and ethics, and the answer will depend on your own personal, subjective opinions.

On one hand, some people would say that we should experiment as much as we can - going to such lengths where the modification through genetic engineering will allow us to create new humans based on our wants and needs. We will be able to choose our baby's eye color, hair color, everything we might want to do will be possible, and for some people, that is a welcome future.

However, on the other hand, there is also a large number of people who are against such modifications, primarily because it is immoral and 'against God.' In their opinion, we are playing God, doing what we were not supposed to do, and therefore will have to pay the price.

It all depends on how you look at the subject - it is quite personal.

3 0
4 years ago
I really need help with this question
Svetlanka [38]

please do not waste this answer because now only ONE other person can answer. If you do not know the answer please do not answer the question. Thankyou!

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Search up Az Chike 1takejay and rucci...if you heard of shoreline or Mike Sherm or blue face then go just saying they way better
    7·1 answer
  • Discuss two ways how lack of basic services has a major negative impact on the health of poor people in South Africa
    9·1 answer
  • Give two examples of what children can learn<br> while playing with toys
    9·1 answer
  • Read the following sentence and answer the question.
    7·1 answer
  • Read the excerpt from Jawaharlal Nehru’s speech "A Tryst with Destiny.” Freedom and power bring responsibility. The responsibili
    10·1 answer
  • Write an essay stating your position on whether competition is necessary for success
    10·1 answer
  • How did Jamestown become successful
    10·1 answer
  • Please help me im about to cry cuz my mom keeps yelling at me I don’t have that many points to keep asking this question
    6·2 answers
  • Type N above each noun, V above each verb or verb part, and P above each pronoun. For any words which do not fit into any of the
    6·1 answer
  • The life expectancy of the average person is increasing because of 1….2….3……!
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!