Answer:
adapting to her audience
Explanation:
In her speech, Kailyn was adapting to her audience.
By saying that an interesting thing or a fact, many orators captures the audiences interests. It is art in public speaking. By doing this the speaker tries to take advantage of the listeners and make their point valid and support their point. It also means to adapt to the environment in which you give the speech.
Thus Kailyn by such clever remarks and quoting tries to capture the attention of her listeners.
Hence the answer is "adapting to her audience".
The Aksum Empire was the result of two world hubs sharing their collective learning about agriculture, and rose to become a great power in the ancient world because it formed a crucial link between East and West on the supercontinent of Afro-Eurasia.
The researchers are relying on anatomical classifications of chimpanzees and humans, as this is most appropriate when looking at adaptation and anatomy.
Because historically, many scientists have believed that we are an evolution of chimpanzees, since their anatomy resembles that of a modern person.
Answer:
Stan's behavior demonstrates time inconsistency.
Explanation:
In Economics, time inconsistency is the change that occurs in a person's preferences over time. That change leads the person to reach a different evaluation when it comes to the costs and the benefits of a decision. In Stan's case, he seems to be prioritizing his time. He even complains that he never has enough time to finish all his homework. We can assume, from his complaint, that he wishes he had the time. Yet, at this very moment, he has chosen to watch three movies instead of doing his assignments. His current decision is inconsistent with what seems to be his preference. Clearly, he believes the benefits of watching the movies to be higher than the costs of not doing his homework. At this moment, therefore, there is an inconsistency between his preferences.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
In the 20s the USA was considered isolationist, America for the Americans so when a influx of immigrants came in they faced harsh feelings from the born and bred Americans.
This can be confused with racism, if what happened in the 20s happened now it would be but there is a difference between not wanting someone in your country based on race and not wanting someone in your country based on the times ideals. We need to stop judging people from over a century ago like we would today, it was a different time, different ideals and different motives. I am not discounting the presents of racism obviously but pointing out the cultural influences at the time.
that was for free lol
