Which best describes the difference between the free-soil territories and those that had popular sovereignty? A. A territory tha
t was free soil was closed to slavery, while one that had popular sovereignty was allowed to vote on the slavery issue. B. A territory that was free soil was open to slavery, while one that had popular sovereignty was allowed to vote on the slavery issue. C. A territory that had popular sovereignty was open to slavery, while one that was free soil was allowed to vote on the slavery issue. D. A territory that had popular sovereignty was closed to slavery, while one that was free soil was allowed to vote on the slavery issue. E. A territory that was free soil accepted the Homestead Act of 1862, while one that had popular sovereignty did not.
The answer is option A. A territory that was free soil was closed to slaver, while one that had popular sovereignty was allowed to vote on the slavery issue.
A. A territory that was free soil was closed to slavery, while one that had popular sovereignty was allowed to vote on the slavery issue.
Explanation:
A territory that was considered to be "free-soil" was a territory that was closed to slavery. This means that slavery was, by law, not allowed within this territory. On the other hand, a territory that was considered to have popular sovereignty was one in which people had the right to self-determination. This meant that they were entitled to vote on the slavery issue and decide their position for themselves.
Not that well. The British attempt to curb westward expansion was a failure - Americans kept on trying to expand and the British were getting tired of paying for defense costs.
