In the passage, "The Perils of Indifference," Wiesel uses the examples of the assassination of famous people and reflects on the people to support his claim.
<h3>What is the idea of "The Perils of Indifference?"</h3>
The complete excerpt is attached below as the image.
"The Perils of Indifference," is a speech that shows that the aftermath of the holocaust caused the indifferences and apathy resulting in the human suffering. He wrote the article to prevent the incidences of genocide, the dangers of apathy, and to bear witness against humanity.
He supports his claim by telling the audience how they will be viewed by the next generation and will be judged for being indifferent to many years. He also described the historical evidence of the assassination of Martin Luther King, and Mahatma Gandhi, to support the text.
Learn more about "The Perils of Indifference," here:
brainly.com/question/24054973
#SPJ1
Answer:
Her mother painted the room her favorite colors (pink and yellows).
Explanation:
You use parentheses to insert extra information that a statement would still be correct without. So you can't have parentheses around parts of a sentence that, if removed, would make the sentence incomplete.
The answer I chose here doesn't need to say that the mother's favourite colours are pink and yellow for the sentence to be complete, so it is stated in parentheses. Removing the part in parentheses would not make the sentence incomplete because the sentence still works without it.
In all the other statements, removing the part in parentheses would have the statements make no sense, which means that the parentheses are incorrectly placed.
<span>c. they help writers focus on the task and organize their writing.</span>
B. I knew the rain falling lightly from the clouds would stop.
Vas happenin!!
The table of content is to help you locate what you need to read
Option one is correct
Hope this helps
-Zayn Malik
