Answer: The y-intercept of the exponential function is <u>approximately 2000 less than </u>the y-intercept of the linear function.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given: The exponential function in the table represents the student population of the county that Greenville is in, in years since 2010.
The standard exponential function is given by :-
, where A is the initial population and x is the number of years.
From table , the multiplicative rate of change b=![\frac{y_3}{y_2}=\frac{4400}{2200}=2](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cfrac%7By_3%7D%7By_2%7D%3D%5Cfrac%7B4400%7D%7B2200%7D%3D2)
Put x=2 and b=2 in the equation, we get
![2200=A(2)^2\\\Rightarrow\ A=\frac{2200}{4}=1950](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=2200%3DA%282%29%5E2%5C%5C%5CRightarrow%5C%20A%3D%5Cfrac%7B2200%7D%7B4%7D%3D1950)
We know that the value of y intercept occurs when x=0,
From the given table , the y intercept of exponential function (Initial population)= 550
The linear function in the graph shows the population of Greenville in the years since 2010.
From the given graph, the y intercept of linear function (x=0 for year 2010)= 2500
The difference in y intercepts = ![2500-550=1950\approx2000....\text{{Rounded nearest thousand}}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=2500-550%3D1950%5Capprox2000....%5Ctext%7B%7BRounded%20nearest%20thousand%7D%7D)
Hence, The y-intercept of the exponential function is <u>approximately 2000 less than </u>the y-intercept of the linear function.