Answer:
B). Comparative negligence.
Explanation:
'Comparative Negligence' is demonstrated as the legal doctrine in which an individual's compensation for an accident or injury is commensurable or proportionate to his/her percentage or degree of responsibility/liability.
in the given example, Susan would most probably employ 'comparative intelligence' to defend herself as damage caused by the dog to shoes and other valuable items was not only due to owner's negligence(but the neighbors/plaintiff too). <u>Thus, this would help Susan to proportionately reduce the amount of the recovery received by the plaintiffs as they too were contributory to the negligence that resulted in damage. </u>Thus, <u>option B</u> is the correct answer.
Answer:
Men and women clothing sizes are usually one size off from each other but if you look on google, there are charts you can use to look at. It won’t let me leave you a link, hope that helps enough. Sorry! :)
Explanation:
<span>C) By bringing to mind more common associations with Shakespeare, the host is emphasizing the remarkableness of Bates’ story.
The host points out common situations where people would have interacted with Shakespeare--in school or in fancy theatres. This helps make what Bates has done stand out as even more remarkable, because no one would ever think of prisons when they first think of Shakespeare. </span>
Answer:
A
Explanation:
They both relate in how tall the parents are