The answer would be exposition because he is explaining something
We can see that filling the blank spaces in the given question, we have:
She knew that she would need to set <u>retrospective</u> goals to demonstrate her commitment to the leadership program and her <u>unparalleled </u>determination to succeed in her new position.
Thus the answer to the question is: A. retrospective ... unparalleled.
<h3>What is goal?</h3>
A goal is actually seen to be what one is aiming to achieve. It actually refers to what someone is looking to get at the end of a task or project. Retrospective goals helps one to look back at what has happened and the achievement so far and then plan towards achieving something better.
Retrospective goals helps the goal-setter to plan better ways on what to do and how to achieve something higher. This leads the individual into activating an unparalleled determination to achieve greatness.
The complete question is:
Fill the blank spaces with the correct option:
She knew that she would need to set ------ goals to demonstrate her commitment to the leadership program and her ------- determination to succeed in her new position.
Thus, option A is the correct answer.
Learn more about goals on brainly.com/question/24693533
#SPJ1
Compare & Contrast Informative Essay/Speech
When speaking or writing for the sole purpose of providing information in order to give audience members a good basis for making a decision, you would present an informative speech or essay. Because you wouldn’t want to be persuading the audience by arguing for one type of exercise over the other, you wouldn’t choose a persuasive/argumentative technique. To fairly, and without bias, present information about the pros and cons of each type exercise, a compare/contrast, informative speech/essay would be the best bet.
In this problem together with the given example, the most probable answer and the most likely one to be the correct answer would be C. analogical reasoning.
The reason would be how the example presented itself. The example goes like "all cats are independent. Mitzy is a cat. Therefore, Mitzy is independent."
With this, it is important to take note that analogy was being used in this given example. Through establishing that one side has a similarity to the other, then it could be also said that the other side can also be compared to another if it has any established similarities.
