According to the given question and statement, the appropriate thesis statement will be as follows: "Today's youth lack the manners that the previous generation did."
The self is the foundation of morality. While some behaviours can be recognised as improper or immoral by oneself, other filters can only be acquired through one's environment. The younger generations are indeed becoming more rude. It is also true that their morality is influenced by the situation of the world at the time this occurs.
Although it would be grave injustice to generalise that all children and youngsters lack morals and manners, the overall trend would undoubtedly indicate that there has been a significant drop among many of them.
Family values have drastically changed over the past few decades, resulting in a generation of rebellious teenagers and young children that lack morality and manners due to inadequate upbringing. When it comes to manners, young people used to be very aware of the older generation. Giving up a seat on the bus, saying "please" and "thank you," and holding open doors were all regarded as polite behaviour. Nowadays, the majority of people live in a "me-first" world, which is reflected in many young people.
Therefore, If good manners are instilled in children at a young age, they will typically remain a part of their personality well into adulthood. Without a doubt, the environment found in the house is a reflection of the lack of manners seen in society as a whole. It is conceivable that the children will badly lack in manners if there is no parental example and no training in this area.
Learn more about 'good manners' here-
brainly.com/question/4786003
#SPJ10
The statement that best describes the narrator in this excerpt is as follows:
- The narrator is not entirely truthful about his reasons for staying in Venice.
Thus, the correct option is B.
<h3>What is Narrator?</h3>
A narrator may be defined as an individual or personality who conveys a story, or a representative fashioned by an author to narrate a description.
The excerpt given below illustrates the situation of being enchanted with Venice and with a girl with a couple of black eyes that is recreating with his spirit. These are the absolute and authentic explanations for the narrator in Venice.
The complete question is as follows:
The romantic character of the place delighted me; I was very much amused by the air of adventure and intrigue that prevailed in this region of masks and gondolas; and I was exceedingly smitten by a pair of languishing black eyes, that played upon my heart from under an Italian mantle. So I persuaded myself that I was lingering in Venice to study men and manners. At least I persuaded my friends so, and that answered all my purpose.
What statement best describes the narrator in this excerpt?
Therefore, the correct option for this question is B, i.e. the narrator is not entirely truthful about his reasons for staying in Venice.
To learn more about Narrator, refer to the link:
brainly.com/question/860877
#SPJ1
Answer:
i do not know because you did not give us a essay
Explanation:
I am a dense thinker; I am constantly being bombarded by feedback from the world around me, and thus am unable to process bulks of information at a time. The small bit of feedback I do maintain, Is usually useless, and therefor is discarded later on. I am in my best environment when I flippantly flop on my bed and slip into a world of my own, comprised of nonsensical 'philosophy'. I truly enjoy this because I have no pressure to acknowledge the chaotic world around me, or to intelligently accomplish anything. Of course, this also means that the majority of my time is spent dozing off and/or being a sheep: unable to think for myself and following people who decide what is right for me. Sometimes, when I put real effort into my activities, I accomplish more than I thought I could. However, effort is hard, so I try to avoid it.
Answer:
Seen against the background of the millennia, the fall of the Roman Empire was so commonplace an event that it is almost surprising that so much ink has been spilled in the attempt to explain it. The Visigoths were merely one among the peoples who had been dislodged from the steppe in the usual fashion. They and others, unable to crack the defenses of Sasanian Persia or of the Roman Empire in the East (though it was a near thing), probed farther west and at length found the point of weakness they were seeking on the Alps and the Rhine. The complicated political relationship existing between France and England in the first half of the 14th century ultimately derived from the position of William the Conqueror, the first sovereign ruler of England who also held fiefs on the continent of Europe as a vassal of the French king. The natural alarm caused to the Capetian kings by their overmighty vassals, the dukes of Normandy, who were also kings of England, was greatly increased in the 1150s. Henry Plantagenet, already duke of Normandy (1150) and count of Anjou (1151), became not only duke of Aquitaine in 1152—by right of his wife, Eleanor of Aquitaine, recently divorced from Louis VII of France—but also king of England, as Henry II, in 1154. A fresh complication was introduced when Charles IV died on February 1, 1328, leaving no male heir. Since there existed at that time no definitive rule about the succession to the French crown in such circumstances, it was left to an assembly of magnates to decide who ought to be the new king. The two principal claimants were Edward III of England, who derived his claim through his mother, Isabella, sister of Charles IV, and Philip, count of Valois, son of Philip IV’s brother Charles.
