Answer:
When my friend will be in a combat thesis troublesome tendencies. You should combat your friend's overconfidence barrier. You can make a little humble request and help him with his cognition barrier or bias. We can request him to think about the other perspective of the situation too.
We can make him understand how things might come in other ways also. We can guide him to pursue the statistics research methodology course from the recognized university or we can say that he can pursue a psychology course too.
The correct answer is letter B
Explanation: This technique is very common and consists of selecting a population sample that is accessible. That is, the individuals employed in this research are selected because they are readily available, not because they were selected using a statistical criterion.
The answer is internal locus of control.
Internal locus of control meaning: Locus of control is the degree to which people believe that they, as opposed to external forces, have control over the outcome of events in their lives.
Question:
Why do you think Lincoln didn't end slavery in the north?
Answer:
The proclamation didn't end slavery because it didn't affect the border slave states that weren't in rebellion, and it had no immediate effect in most of the deep South because, at least on the day it was issued, the slaves were in territory still controlled by the Confederacy.
Explanation:
Abraham Lincoln did believe that slavery was morally wrong, but there was one big problem: It was sanctioned by the highest law in the land, the Constitution. The nation’s founding fathers, who also struggled with how to address slavery, did not explicitly write the word “slavery” in the Constitution, but they did include key clauses protecting the institution, including a fugitive slave clause and the three-fifths clause, which allowed Southern states to count enslaved people for the purposes of representation in the federal government.
In a three-hour speech in Peoria, Illinois, in the fall of 1854, Lincoln presented more clearly than ever his moral, legal and economic opposition to slavery—and then admitted he didn’t know exactly what should be done about it within the current political system.
Abolitionists, by contrast, knew exactly what should be done about it: Slavery should be immediately abolished, and freed enslaved people should be incorporated as equal members of society. They didn’t care about working within the existing political system, or under the Constitution, which they saw as unjustly protecting slavery and enslavers. Leading abolitionist William Lloyd Garrison called the Constitution “a covenant with death and an agreement with Hell,” and went so far as to burn a copy at a Massachusetts rally in 1854.
-Alan Becker
