The slow decrease in memory as one ages is an example of a/n<u> intra-individual</u> difference.
Reaction time intra-individual variability (RT IIV) is regarded as a measure of how well the central nervous system is working. In neurodegenerative disorders or after traumatic brain damage, such variability is increased. Additionally, it has been hypothesised that healthy ageing will rise with age.
RT IIV was higher in older (60+) persons compared to younger (20-39) and middle-aged (40-59) adults. In choice RT tasks compared to simple RT tasks, age effects were more pronounced. Effect sizes were bigger for comparisons between older and younger individuals than between older and middle-aged adults for all measures of RT IIV, showing that age-related increases in RT IIV are not just present in the elderly. Additionally, raw RT IIV measurements had greater effect sizes than RT-mean adjusted RT IIV measures.
To learn more about intra-individual difference refer
brainly.com/question/6761737
#SPJ4
<span>If Lea's threats are specific threats against specific people. Psychologists
have a very specific confidentiality code, they must keep in
"professional secrecy" everything said by their patients during the
therapeutic process. However, this code can be broken if the patient's life is in danger, or if the patient can put someone else's life at risk. <span>In these cases, professionals have a security code to follow to safeguard people's lives.
I hope my answer can help you.
</span></span>
The answer is True. Cognitive diversity refers to the similarities in view points and methods in problem solving. Though according to Scott Page, he says that not all forms of diversity are not equally effective. We vary from the different perspectives and methods or techniques to solve a problem that would lead to better outcome. The variation of techniques helps a group for them not to use the same technique and opens them with a lot of all other techniques.
Answer:
Quakers
Explanation:
Puritans couldn't get along with natives and had no tolerance for religion outside their own.
Pilgrims didn't settle in the middle colonies.
Separatists were with the pilgrims and wanted religious freedom from England. They set off and were like the puritans. Of course, the natives weren't too fond of them. They tried to get along at first, but religious tensions won over in the end.
Quakers were the nice ones that won out, not only because they bought the land before settling, they made an agreement with the natives first. They made an association to preserve their relationship.
