Perhaps direct a question to Ellen on whether she’s read any other book by the Author to justify why she hates the author
<u>Answer:</u>
The sequence of key ideas is as follows:
- Travel by land and water were solved in the nineteenth century.
- The twentieth century will solve the problem of flight.
- Wind resistance is a concern that needs to be solved.
- Wilbur and Orville confirm the existence of tangential force.
- Wilbur estimates they will need at least an engine weighing one hundred pounds.
- He estimates the first flying machine will only reach low speeds.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Key idea 1 introduces the main idea of travel and states that land and water travel were taken care of in the nineteenth century, leaving air travel by implication, which is stated in the next idea. It is further elaborated in detail in the third point which explains the aspect of the problem that needed to be solved. The fourth idea introduces Wilbur and Orville and states their findings on the existence of tangential force, elaborating the former's estimates in the fifth and sixth key points.
The correct answer is "It is best described as an anecdote".
We consider an anecdote to be a personal account or retelling of a particular event or incident. The key word here is "personal". In the example given, we clearly see how <u>the point of view is from the protagonist of a certain personal experience he had and the way he felt about it, constituting it as an anecdote.</u>
We don't know for a fact Utopians don't care about riches, because we're only getting a single man's experience which in addition, cannot be proven.
An analogy recquires some sort of strong comparisson of metaphor that isn't really present in this excerpt.
Hope this helps!
Answer:
Most scientists do not consider intelligent design to be sound science.
