Answer:
The purpose of product safety policies and legislation is to keep consumers safe, with the expectation that product quality is balanced against business profits. How does a company factor these competing expectations and still hold the consumer responsible for safe and effective use of the product? Product safety is a key component of any business.
Explanation:
Answer:
The basic earnings per share is $4.15
Explanation:
Earning Per Share : Earning Per share shows a ratio between net income and weighted average outstanding shares.
In mathematically,
Earning Per Share = Net income ÷ weighted average outstanding shares
where,
Net income = $269,915
And, On Jan 1, 2018 the share is 50,000 whereas on April, 2018 the shares is 20,000. But we have to calculated for the December period. From April to December there are 9 months.
So, April 2018 shares = 20,000 × 9 ÷ 12 months = 15,000 shares
Hence, total weighted average outstanding shares is
= 50,000 +15,000
= 65,000 shares
Now, apply the above formula for computation
= $269,915 ÷ 65,000 shares
= $4.15 per share
Thus, the basic earnings per share is $4.15
Answer:
<h2>The present value of PV in this case is $527.76 approximately.</h2>
Explanation:
The mathematical or accounting formula of Present Value(PV)=
where FV denotes the future cash payment to be made,r represents the discount rate and n is the number of years in which the future payment has to made.Here,the future cash payment of FV is given as $1350,the discount rate is 11% or 0.11 and the number of years in which the FV has to be paid is 9 years.
Hence,PV in this case=
approximately
Therefore,based on the information given the PV in this case is $527.76 approximately.
Answer:
Company should continue with old machine (Alternative 1)
Explanation:
Preparation of a differential analysis dated April 11 on whether to continue with the old machine (Alternative 1) or replace the old machine (Alternative 2)
DIFFERENTIAL ANALYSIS
Continue with old machine(Alternative 1) ; Replace with old machine(Alternative 2); Differential effect on income
REVENUES
Proceeds from sale of machine
$0 $50500 $50500
COSTS
Purchase price $0 -$75000 -$75000
Direct labor -$56000 -$37000 19000
(11200*5 = -56000)
(7400*5 = -37000)
Income (loss) -$56000 -$61500 -$5500
Based on the above differential analysis the Company should continue with OLD MACHINE (Alternative 1)
Answer:
Risk and Return
1. Joe is an average investor. His financial advisor gave him options of investing in stock A, with a σ of 12%, and stock B, with a σ of 9%. Both stocks have the same expected return of 16%. Joe can pick only one stock and decides to invest in stock B.
Good Financial Decision?
Yes
No
2. Marcie works for an educational technology firm that recently launched its employee stock option plan (ESOP). Marcie allocated all her investments in the ESOP.
Good Financial Decision?
Yes
No
3. rin wants to invest in a hedge fund that has had a very strong performance track record. The hedge fund has given its investors a return of over 60% for the past five years. Although Erin is tempted to put her money in the fund, she decides to conduct due diligence on the hedge fund’s assets, because she is aware that past performance is no guarantee of future results.
Good Financial Decision?
Yes
No
Explanation:
1. Joe's decision to invest in stock B is a good financial decision. Since both investments have the same returns, the decision on which investment to take shifts to the standard deviation of the returns, which specifies the variability of the returns. Invariably, the investment with less standard deviation should win the vote. Therefore, Joe's decision is a good financial decision because investment in B has a standard deviation of 9% unlike A's 12%.
2. Putting all eggs in one market as Marcie had done by allocating all her investments in the ESOP is not a good financial decision, theoretically. It is always best to spread the risks, though higher-yielding investments (returns) bear higher risks.
3. The decision of Erin to conduct due diligence on the hedge fund's assets, despite its past performance is a good financial decision. Due diligence reveals some behind-the-scene information that are instrumental in making sound business decisions. Who are the present managers of the fund? What systems are in place in the entity to guarantee similar future performance, all things being equal? What market's sentiments and information are available for consideration? These questions, and many others can be answered through a due diligence. Surely, "past performance is no guarantee of future results."
