Explanation:
In simpler words, the multi-part question is asking for you to first analyze the three sources, then pick a side and have knowledge to defend your point on the question 'to what extent should nations pursue their national interests'.
In source 1, it shows that the majority of Canadians are opposed to sending troops to Afghanistan, with 36% voting for, 5% unsure, and 59% voting against.
Source two is clearly depicting the nazi's, at a rally held in Nuremberg. Although the source does not state if the protesters are pro or against Nazi regime, I am assuming they are pro. This would lead to the assumption that the people of Nuremberg are pro-Nazi empire.
The source 3 is a timeline, that goes from 1920 to 2005. This time period is very significant, because it captures many important battles, such as world war 2, Persian Gulf War, and the Iraq invasion.
After reading these three sources, you must decide if you think it is good for nations to pursue their national interests, or bad.
Hope this long explanation helped clarify the troubling question for you!
The last Carolingian King of France was Luois V. He died aged 20 without children and had only one brother who died before him and this was the end of the Carolingian dynasty.
The successor was Hugh Capet - this is the correct answer. Hugh was also a descendant of Charlemagne. <span />
<span>The English government wanted help paying for the war from the: French
Even though they technically won the war, the gained a lot of debt to fund the supplies needed for the war. So, they asked American colonies for help.
According to their argument, American is indirectly benefited from their victory and therefore it is only fair if we also contribute to their cost.</span>
Answer:
D.
Explanation:
One of the biggest problems was that the national government had no power to impose taxes. To avoid any perception of “taxation without representation,” the Articles of Confederation allowed only state governments to levy taxes. To pay for its expenses, the national government had to request money from the states.
Answer:
Explanation:
"While the terms country, state, sovereign state, nation, and nation-state are often used interchangeably, there is a difference. Simply put: A state is a territory with its own institutions and populations. ... A nation-state is a cultural group (a nation) that is also a state (and may, in addition, be a sovereign state)."
