Answer:
Nativism is the political policy of promoting the interests of native inhabitants against those of immigrants,[1] including the support of immigration-restriction measures.[2]
In scholarly studies, nativism is a standard technical term, although those who hold this political view do not typically accept the label. Oezguer Dindar wrote, "[N]ativists [...] do not consider themselves [to be] nativists. For them it is a negative term and they rather consider themselves as 'Patriots'.[3]
Answer:
increased food supply
Explanation:
with better, more nutritious food, they were able to live longer, and were healthier
Money, resources, soldiers, allies
Answer:
They can lead to the lifting of sanctions.
Explanation:
Aid doesn't help an economy.
Competing with the United States is more like a result of having a developed economy, rather than a cause of an economy developing. Plus, the United States wouldn't likely export the same things as a developing nation.
International trade agreements don't help an economy to 'grow quickly', plus this is a really general answer.
The lifting of sanctions is really important. It's hard to develop under sanctions. Trade agreements allow for the regulation, reduction and removal of sanctions. For example, if the US made a trade deal with Mexico, it would greatly help Mexico to develop, as they would now be trading more freely with the United States.
Ferdinand ii tried to exert authority over protestants and exert authority over local nobles. This statement refers to a famous historical event, the most destructive conflicts in human history -Thirty Years' War. The war took place because of <span>the election of the new </span>Holy Roman Emperor<span>, </span>Ferdinand II, who wanted to force<span> </span>Roman Catholicism<span> on its peoples.</span>
