The answer is: When students believed the exam would be implemented the following year, both the expertise of the source and the quality of the arguments equally influenced their attitudes.
This happen because the student's argument is extremely influenced by whether they could be involved in the comprehensive exam.
If the exam would be implemented in the following year, the students are very likely to face the exam themselves. This make them much more likely to have negative attitudes toward the idea.
If the exam would be implemented in the next 10 years, the students wouldn't have to face it. Therefore, their attitude would be less negative toward the comprehensive exam.
I think B is the best answer but I am very sorry if it is wrong
I would say this can be answered with a couple of the choices but ur teacher would probably want Answer D the most. If you have a future in technology and engineering which are high paying fields , learning how to use technology well can be detrimental to having a successful future career.
Giving different branches different powers
Answer: you dumb
Explanation: just kidding idk know
