It is a diary/record/manuscript, hope that helps you!
<span>The Puritans were a religious movement associated with Protestantism, which defended an extreme moral rigidity with customs of evangelical morality. was also called Calvinism and took place in modern science. It constituted religious struggles and its crisis began with the rejection to the rebirth and did not manage to impose its dogma in the social structures, for this they carried out many battles in the attempt to take the doctrine without obtaining the result. As a result of the crisis suffered today is professed among the Anglican faithful with little trace of it, many Puritans fled to other countries where they then introduced Presbyterianism from the Calvinist reform of the Church of Scotland.</span>
I would say that the best tools for establishing and preserving freedom are the Constitution, courts, and legislature in general.
The Constitution is a set of laws that all people within one country should follow and it is a document which guarantees their freedom and equality. Courts and other laws do the same thing as well.
<span>Slavery was morally wrong. He dod not like the idea of slavery which happened to cause the Civil War</span>
Absolutism was a very common form of government in Europe between the 16th and 19th centuries and defended the theory of the king's absolute power over the entire nation. The power of kings during the <u>Middle Ages </u>was considered limited compared to the absolutist period, as there was a lot of political fragmentation and the king's influence depended on a relationship of vassalage, in which the exchange of favors between kings and nobles guaranteed real power.
As modern nations were being structured, mainly England, France and Spain, and as trade resurfaced in Europe, a new social class emerged with great economic power: the bourgeoisie. For the bourgeoisie, the political and economic fragmentation that existed since the Middle Ages was not interesting, as it affected their business, mainly because of the differences in currency and taxes existing from one province to another (even in provinces of the same kingdom, there were these differences in currency and taxes).
The nobility, in turn, welcomed the concentration of power in the figure of the monarch as a way to guarantee control of the lands he owned. Thus, the concentration of power in the hands of the king was a demand from the rising bourgeoisie and also from the nobility.
