1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Natasha_Volkova [10]
3 years ago
8

How does the relationship between the federal government and state government differ from the relationship between stay and loca

l governments
History
1 answer:
mina [271]3 years ago
7 0

States and the federal government have both exclusive powers and concurrent powers. There is an ongoing negotiation over the balance of power between the two levels.

One reason for the ongoing negotiation over the balance of power between states and the federal government is their exclusive and concurrent powers. Exclusive powers are those powers reserved to the federal government or the states. Concurrent powers are powers shared by the federal government and the states.Only the federal government can coin money, regulate the mail, declare war, or conduct foreign affairs. These powers make a lot of sense: imagine if Wyoming could declare war on Canada, or Michigan could coin the Michigan Dollar. The exclusive powers of the federal government help the nation operate as a unified whole.

The states retain a lot of power, however. States conduct all elections, even presidential elections, and must ratify constitutional amendments. So long as their laws do not contradict national laws, state governments can prescribe policies on commerce, taxation, healthcare, education, and many other issues within their state.

You might be interested in
He leader of the red shirts who helped to unify italy through his military command was
alexandr1967 [171]
Google: Giuseppe Garibaldi
5 0
3 years ago
What are the key traits of the Romantic era?
Rom4ik [11]
Shsndbsbbasjjajsjajajaja
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
When he suggested that change should be brought about “by any means necessary,” Malcolm X was stating violence would be necessar
inna [77]

Answer:

A) Violence would be necessary to achieve civil rights goals.

Explanation:

Malcolm X was a famous civil rights leader during the 1960's. In terms of inciting change, his style was much different than the nonviolent methods used by people such as Martin Luther King Jr. Instead, Malcolm X advocated for self defense and violence if necessary. Malcom X argued that if whites were going to use violence against black citizens, than these black citizens should have the right and responsibility to fight back to protect themselves.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How many province are there in New Zealand ​
aleksley [76]

Answer:

16 provinces... And 50 сity

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following best explains the reason Polish immigration emerged during the early statehood time?
Luba_88 [7]
It came from Texas that is all I know sorry
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The rivalries between the city-states had positive value for Greece. True False
    14·1 answer
  • I d o n t  n e e d  a n y t h I n g
    11·1 answer
  • Which of these is a power of the united states president?
    12·1 answer
  • How are Georgia’s Supreme Court justices selected?
    10·2 answers
  • Based on what you have learned, select each response below that correctly describes a barrier to African American voting in the
    13·2 answers
  • Who is associated with the Three Principles of the People in China?
    6·2 answers
  • 1.) What changes did the Mexican Constitution of 1917 enact? 2.) What were the main effects of the Mexican Revolution? 3.) What
    5·1 answer
  • How did Hoover's and Roosevelt's approaches to handling the Great Depression differ?
    11·1 answer
  • What positive emotions did the troops experience and why?
    9·2 answers
  • PLS ASAP!!!!
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!