Answer:
Lincoln's contrast of free labour and slave labour is quite different as he did not base his argument on the fact that free labourers had the conset to work for a wage and slave labourer did not.
Explanation:
- Rather he argued that the difference was that among the free labourers there was hope to escape from the current condition to a better one whereas slave labourers lacked this kind of hope.
- It is not the consent that distinguishes free labour from slave labourers but rather the independence of choice the rise to own productive property and to work for oneself.
The Supreme Court case Marbury vs. Madison upheld the following ideas:
1) The Supreme Court has the power of judicial review- This means that the Supreme Court has the ability to interpret the constitution.
2) The Judiciary Act of 1789 was unconstitutional- This act gave more power to the Supreme Court than intended by Article III of the US Constitution.
3) The court did not have the power to compel James Madison to deliver the commission to William Marbury. This means that William Marbury would not become a justice of the peace.
3
false.
The transfer of Naboth's land by Ahab was a complete disrespect of mosaic law. this is because, according to the law, no Israelite was supposed to sell the ancestral land or transfer it to a third party. instead, it was to be inherited from one generation to another. therefore, the act of Ahab was a violation to this rule.
the U.S. government to process the increasing number of immigrants.
