<span>Kotter's 8 steps of leading change can be applied in managing change.</span><span>Creating a sense of urgency will help spark the initial motivation to get things moving. Forming a powerful coalition will ensure that the change effort is supported by key decision makers. Creating a vision for the change will help make it memorable. Communicating the change will ensure that people's concerns are addressed so that they can embrace it. Removing obstacles will reduce resistance faced. Creating short term wins will provide momentum needed to keep the changes going. Building on change will enable shortcomings to be improved. Anchoring the change on corporate culture will ensure that it sticks. </span>
When a monopolist's level of output is not at the minimum point of <u>average total cost</u>, this means it will not be productively efficient.
<h3>What is an
average total cost?</h3>
An average total cost refers to a cost derived from total fixed and variable costs divided by total units produced.
In conclusion, this cost is used to evaluate how the total per-unit cost change as a result of output
Read more about average total cost
<em>brainly.com/question/25109150</em>
Answer:
C is the correct answer.
Explanation:
The result of the Bretton Woods System was launched after the end of the world war. It was a liberal system as it aimed to set an open system of international trade in goods and services. It was also facilitated by semi-fixed exchange rates. But at the same time, it wanted to embed the market forces in a framework where they could be controlled by National Governments so that they can control the international capital flow. And for this purpose, The world Bank and International Monetary fund were created.
Answer: A. Stability and change
Explanation:
The innovation paradox implies that consistency in products and services provokes a tension with the need for new products. This results in a conflict between
A) stability and change.
B) structure and culture.
C) rewards and metrics.
D) stability and metrics
The paralysis that occurs between sticking to existing products and services (stability) and the need for the development of new ones (change) is a direct effect of the innovation paradox which states that the more a firm pays attention to innovation, the less likely it will be to be successful at innovation. In other words, consistency in products and services provokes a tension with the need for new products. While stability enables change in that it supplies security and consistency, reserved knowledge and skills and enables commitment and the provision of resources for a better realization and actualization of change, change enables a firm to set up a new state of stability through variable mechanisms (innovation) This serves to assist an organization in reaching new stable stages with higher efficiency.
Answer:
Sarah inventory $ 123.75
Luke inventory $ 125.00
Explanation:
<u>Sarah</u>
125 dollars x 1% discount = 1.25 dollars
Inventory:
125 nominal - 1.25 discount = 123.75
Sarah will enter the inventory for the price it paid to acquire it which is 123.75
<u>Luke</u>
As look paid after the discount period the inventory will be valued at nominal:
125 dollars nominal
<u>the charge is considered interest expense</u> it will not be capitalize through inventory.