Answer: Gambler's fallacy
Explanations: Gambler's fallacy can be simply defined as a phenomenon where the outcome of an event is viewed as less or more likely due to the outcome of previous events even though each event is independent.
For example, If a family should give birth to (5) five boys, gambler's fallacy will argue that the chance or probability of the family giving birth to girl next higher because the previous ones were boys, but in reality the chances are thesame because both gender has equally chance of being conceived.
So Miranda’s statement is a good example of gambler's fallacy because she argue that the probability that she will toss a tail in her sixth toss is higher than 50% and in reality, the probability of tossing a head or a tail are both thesame i.e 50%.
INTENT - 1st part was for why they were really wrting the declaraion in the first place, and the rights for individuals and the government purpose.
LIST OF GRIEVANCES - The unfair things that King George, For example, "taxation without representation". The refusal of good things the citizens did and soldiers could not live in the citizens home without consent.
DECLARATION - this meant that they were going to gain independance from Great Britain.
I believe the answer is: <span> utilitarianism
</span><span> utilitarianism refers to a principle that view the best decision that can be made would be the one that utilize the full efficiency of the resources.
</span>In the process, <span> utilitarianism society might overlooked things such as moral as long as the benefit outweigh the unethical impact.</span>
Through checks and balances
