One point of view is that immigration is a bad thing because jobs are being handed out to people who aren't even US born citizens. The opposing side says immigration is good because America is the land of freedom and equality for <em>everyone,</em> and even immigrants should get a chance at the pursuit of happiness.
They were made up of the colonies. New England colonies were very conservative, not religiously tolerant, and a similar minded community. They banished a few people who threatened their community like Anne Hutchinson. The Chesapeake colonies were the most diverse and accepting because they were in between the Southern colonies and New England colonies. The Southern colonies were primarily made up of the slave population, which of course brought out the racist thoughts in the Caucasian people of the South.
The battle of kharkov is a historical battle as it is recognized as one of the battles of the epic World War II. Kharkov is the second-biggest largest city of Ukraine. There were four battles in the battle of kharkov which ocurred succeedingly in 1941, 1942, 1943 and another one of the same year. Based on some documentations of the battle, the army uses tanks, cannons, guns and other military weapons in order to carry out plans and tactics. The antagonists at that battle were the Germans who planned to capture the city, the Soviet forces who tried to gain control next, then the Germans again forcing the city to be on its hands.
Answer: His master is crueler after finding religion than he was before.
Explanation:
Douglas considered his master as a cruel man. His master once went out for a christian camp meeting and in the course of the meeting, he surrendered his life to Christ. Due to this, Douglass hoped that this religious transformation would result in his master being less cruel toward his slaves, and this didn't turn out to be the case, rather the master became more cruel.
This is an irony, because Douglass experienced the opposite of his expectation. An irony is the expression of one's meaning by the use of language which normally signifies the opposite, usually for emphatic or humorous effect.
