I believe the correct answer to your question is parallel. I apologize for the late answer and if the answer I provided is incorrect.
Answer:
1. It Is a clear expression of fake democracy. The term "free election" doesn't entirely make sense in a country where any distinction between the ruling party and the government has been almost completely erased. Syria is considered a unitary republic with a semi-presidential style of government. However, the controlling parties practice a highly authoritarian regime with most of the political power in the AL-Assad family's hands. People doesn't have more option if the want to "live".
2. If I live in that country, I think I feel like a hostage. Elections over there aren't free, and they're certainly not fair. The resulting optics are not democratic enough. They buy the government a minimum of democratic credibility abroad without seriously imperiling its hold on power.
Explanation:
Answer:
They aimed for the Ottoman Empire to become a secular monarchy.
Explanation:
On one hand, people consider bureaucracies as necessary administrative instruments that will ensure an orderly management of an organization.
On the other hand, bureaucracies are also believed to be the source of inefficiency in organizations. Which leads to a low perception of quality in the services they provide.
It is a matter of finding an adequate point between a swift service and good controlling tools. Even if this point is found, it demands constant revisions, as the reality of the environment which an organization serves changes with time.
