The Swedish Empire (Swedish: stormaktstiden, "the era of great power") refers to the Kingdom of Sweden's territorial control of much of the Baltic region during the 17th and early 18th centuries, a time when Sweden was one of the great European powers.[1] The beginning of the Empire is usually taken as the reign of Gustavus Adolphus, who ascended the throne in 1611, and the end as the loss of territories in 1721 following the Great Northern War. In Swedish history, the period is referred to as stormaktstiden, literally meaning "the Great Power era".[1]
After the death of Gustavus Adolphus in 1632, the empire was, over lengthy periods, controlled by part of the high nobility, most prominently the Oxenstierna family, acting as tutors for minor regents. The interests of the high nobility contrasted with the uniformity policy (i.e., the upholding of the traditional equality in status of the Swedish estates favoured by the kings and peasantry). In territories acquired during the periods of de facto noble rule, serfdom was not abolished, and there was also a trend to set up respective estates in Sweden proper. The Great Reduction of 1680 put an end to these efforts of the nobility and required them to return estates once gained from the crown to the king. Serfdom, however, remained in force in the dominions acquired in the Holy Roman Empire and in Swedish Estonia, where a consequent application of the uniformity policy was hindered by the treaties by which they were gained.
After the victories in the Thirty Years' War, the climax of the great power era was reached during the Second Northern War, when their primary adversary Denmark was neutralized by the Treaty of Roskilde in 1658. However, in the further course of this war as well as in the subsequent Scanian War, Sweden was able to maintain her empire only with support of her closest ally, France.[2] Charles XI of Sweden consolidated the empire and ensured a period of peace, before Russia, Saxony and Denmark started a concerted attack on his successor, Charles XII. After initial Swedish victories, Charles secured the empire for some time in the Peace of Travendal (1700) and the Treaty of Altranstädt (1706), before the Battle of Poltava (1709) finally brought the great power era of Sweden to an end.
Answer:
4
Explanation:
It's not illegal its pretty effective
Answer:
Isolationism is described as <u>D.internally focused foreign policy</u>
Explanation:
Isolationism is a foreign policy that believes in the government having an 'internal focus' where the government should try to improve to solve national problems before taking care of issues that are far from home.
Isolationism can be both political and economic. A isolationist political policy would mean that a country decides not to take part in world events and instead use their funds and energy internally.
An example of this can be countries like Switzerland, which do not take part in international wars and missions and only recently joined the UN.
An economic isolationist policy is when a country decides to not trade freely around the world. This might be to safeguard local natural resources or against foreign competition. There have been many examples of such countries, one of the best known being Japan in the early 15th century.
Answer:
Explanation:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slavery_in_Africa
Which of the following is an exception to the claim that Americans don’t vote and don’t participate when compared to other advanced democracies?
A. In some countries like Belgium and Australia voting is mandatory.
This shows the supporting detail that is used to show that Americans don’t vote and don’t participate when compared to other advanced democracies as their voting is not mandatory.
<h3>What is Voting?</h3>
This refers to the civic duty and responsibility of any citizen of a country and this is where they cast their vote for their preferred candidates in an election.
Hence, we can see that the exception to the claim that Americans don’t vote and don’t participate when compared to other advanced democracies is A. In some countries like Belgium and Australia voting is mandatory.
Based on the fact that voting is not mandatory in America, but it is in Belgium and Australia, this lends credence to the claim that Americans don’t vote and don’t participate when compared to other advanced democracies.
Read more about voting here:
brainly.com/question/13474496
#SPJ1
