Answer:
I got a new puppy because I have been responsible lately.
Explanation:
Subordinating conjunctions are words used to connect dependent clauses to independent clauses and express the cause-and-effect relationship or a shift in time and place between these clauses.
It's important to know what each subordinating conjunction means.
<em>Sometimes</em> is not a conjunction at all. It is an adverb.
In the second sentence, there is no conjunction.
<em>If</em> is a conjunction used to introduce the condition necessary for the event described in the independent clause to take place. The third option is incorrect because the events have already taken place. A correct option would be:<em> I will get a new puppy if I am responsible</em>.
<em>Because </em>is a conjunction used to express a cause-and-effect relationship between the subordinate and independent clause. This is the only correct option. <em>Why did I get a new puppy? </em><em>Because I have been responsible lately.</em>
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although you forgot to include the name of the documentary or a link to it, we did some research to find what you are talking about.
You are referring to the documentary titled "It Takes a Child: Craig Kielburger's Story. A Journey into Child Labor," produced by Craig Kielburger.
After watching the documentary, I think it was important for Kielburger to make the documentary because it was a professional way to document this sad situation in south Asia countries and expose the problem to the world to create awareness of this terrible issue of exploiting children through labor in that region.
The result and acceptance of his documentary helped him to found the non-governmental organization called "Free the Children" that has thousands of members in 20 countries.
Answer and Explanation:
In the short story "Marigolds", by Eugenia Collier, the narrator lives in a poor black community. The story takes place during the Great Depression that devastated the United States in the 1930's. <u>Even though there were people who said "prosperity... was 'just around the corner,'" the narrator and her community knew better than to believe those words. They had always been poor. Their hard work never paid off. Those words, according to the narrator, "were white folks’ words." Maybe prosperity would return to white people soon, but the narrator's community had never seen or had it; the American Dream never came true for them. How can they believe those words if the people who say such words are the ones who exploit their work?</u>
