<span>Social
alienation is the social condition
characterized by low degree of integration or the sharing of common values with
others, and the overwhelming isolation from the community.
</span>
Here
is how social alienation is reflected in the following sentences:
<span>
1. "We all had the same medals, except the
boy with the black silk bandage across his face, and he had not been at the
front long enough to get any medals. The tall boy with a very pale face who was
to be a lawyer had been lieutenant of Arditi carefully selected volunteers
specializing in dangerous campaigns and had three medals of the sort we each
had only one of. He had lived a very long time with death and was a little
detached.</span> "
While
all them were from the war, the speaker chose to look at how different they
were--with or without medals, length of service etc. Social alienation caused
by war is shown here as the speaker describes each person not by his social
skills, but by social status/ position in the military.
<span>
2.
We were all a little detached, and there
was nothing that held us together except that we met every afternoon at the
hospital. </span>
<span> The speaker explains the disposition of them
three. they were disconnected and withdrawn. Social alienation is characterized
by disinterest and indifference to others, even if they shared an experience.
The speaker expresses his remote feelings to the others by mentioning the
afternoon sessions in the hospital is the only thing that is common to them
all.</span>
<span>
3.
Although, as we walked to the Cova
through the tough part of town, walking in the dark, with light and singing
coming out of the wine-shops, and sometimes having to walk into the street when
the men and women would crowd together on the sidewalk so that we would have
had to jostle them to get by, we felt held together by there being something
that had happened that they, the people who disliked us, did not understand.</span>
<span>
In
this sentence, the speaker showed social alienation caused by war as he relates
the standoffishness between them veterans and the rest of the community( who
disliked them). It shows that social alienation caused by war is the constant feeling and/or thinking that there is
absolutely nothing common between two people or between two groups.</span>
Option A, The Bonus Army was attacked with tear gas.
Explanation:
The US Army, commanded by MacArthur, Patton, and Eisenhower, targeted WWI soldiers on July 28, 1932, with tanks, bayonets, and tear gas. The service members of World War I belonged to a bonus army that came to Washington. To order the wartime rewards offered.
The Army was then instructed by president Herbert Hoover to the body block of marchers. General Douglas MacArthur, Press secretary of the Army, controlled the infantry and troops of six tanks With their spouses and children, the Bonus Army marchers were forced out and their tents and possessions were burned.
Although it was named ' the grave ' bonus, ' the service members were satisfied with the requirement that the bonus could be paid immediately on the soldier's death. Economic relaxation wanted the upfront payment of the bonus.
Answer:
D. what elements are used, and do they help the author’s purpose?
Explanation:
This is the only one out of the four options that would lead you to conduct an in-depth analysis.
Answer:
This is the correct answer
<h2>Stanley loved playing soccer: thus he also enjoyed running.</h2>
Explanation:
as you can see the two dot represents a a part of sentence and the quite shall be placed after the thus and a period at the last
Answer:
For the past few years, I’ve traveled the globe talking with male executives about how to close the gender gap. In the wake of the #MeToo movement, men who never considered sexism to be “their” issue were suddenly eager to become male allies, to help solve the problem.
As businesses grapple with the institutional racism built in to so many of our structures, history gives us some clues – and some warnings about what we may get wrong, yet again.
Consider what’s happened in the wake of the #MeToo movement. It’s been almost three years since it became a global rallying cry, sparked by revelations about Harvey Weinstein and others. It broadened attention not just on sexual assault, but on the everyday indignities that women face: being marginalized, overlooked, and underpaid. There were plenty of firings then too, and plenty of talk from executives and politicians. But actual impact? Not so much.
Explanation:
