Answer:
While Native Americans and English settlers in the New England territories first attempted a mutual relationship based on trade and a shared dedication to spirituality, soon disease and other conflicts led to a deteriorated relationship and, eventually, the First Indian War.
Explanation:
1. The word 'tend' means 'disposed to', or 'frequently leads to' destruction.
2. Author chose this subtitle for this section to explain how difficult it was for the French people to control the Vietnamese people.
3. Ruined means destruction.
4. The Vietnamese people were doing the ruining.
Explanation:
The article, "The Vietnam Wars," highlights the resistance put up by the Vietnamese people when other nations like the Chinese and French tried to subjugate them. In that section, the phrase, "Everything Tends to Ruin", was used by a French Military commander to summarize the frustration of the French people who tried to colonize the Vietnamese people.
The locals used their knowledge of the terrains to cause mayhem to their colonists. They resisted the schooling offered by the French people and rather embraced their culture. All ploys by the French colonists to subjugate them were met with resistance.
Is French a Latin language?
French is a Romance language (which means that it's miles descended frequently from Vulgar Latin) that advanced out of the Gallo-Romance dialects spoken in northern France. The language's early paperwork include antique French and middle French.
Is French easy to speak?
French is fairly smooth to study however it does make the effort and effort. As French is closely related to English, I need to agree with the overseas Language Institute that says that French belongs to the perfect organization of languages to examine for English speakers. Having a lot common vocabulary facilitates lots.
Learn more about French here:- brainly.com/question/26437501
#SPJ9
Answer:
ik the answer key to that whole assignment it is **link deleted** Explanation:
The best answer would be D.
The debate over whether a bill of rights should be added to the Constitution or not, started from some delegates' beliefs that guarantees of certain basic rights were missing from the ratified Constitution. They wanted some amendments to be included, in order to secure those liberties to the citizens.
The Federalists (those who supported the ratification of the Constitution) argued that the Constitution did not need a bill of rights because the people and the states kept any powers not given to the federal gonvernmnet. Alexander Hamilton, for example, argued that because the proposed federal government would possess only specifically assigned limited powers, ir could not threaten the fundamental liberties of the people. Anti-Federalists, however, held that a bill of rights was necessary to safeguard individual liberty and the power of the states.
