International foods corporation insures its real and personal property, as well as the lives of its key employees, to protect its financial interest should some event undermine its security. this is:____.
Food Security
What is meant by food security ?
According to the Committee on World Food Security of the United Nations, food security is the state in which all people, at all times, have physical, social, and economic access to enough, safe, and nourishing food that satisfies their dietary needs and food preferences for an active and healthy life.
International Foods Corporation insures its real estate, personal belongings, and the lives of its key personnel in order to safeguard its financial interests in the event that something were to compromise its security. Food security is this.
Learn more about food security here:
brainly.com/question/1618431
#SPJ4
Answer and explanation:
There are several roles trainers could adopt while handling trainee groups but the most important are: <em>instructional designer, technical writer, </em>and <em>needs analyst</em>. From the three of them being a needs analyst could represent the most challenging because it implies collecting information of different individuals to identify what they are lacking and based on that information collect data that can be useful for their learning process.
On the other hand, being a technical writer could be the easiest since professional trainers manage their field of study. They tend to portrait their knowledge in written documents using technical terminology suiting it to the audience they are going to work with.
Answer:
I used the most recent figures of the international property rights index (year 2019), and the most recent GDP per capita estimamtes by the IMF in purchasing power parity. (year 2019)
Three countries with high scores, with GDP per capita (PPP):
- Finland - score of 8.712 - U$ 46.430
- Switzerland - score of 8.571 - U$ 64.649
- United States - score of 8.202 - U$ 62.606
Three countries with low scores, with GDP per capita (PPP):
- Ukraine - score of 4.432 - U$ 9.283
- Pakistan - score of 3.874 - U$ 5.680
- Haiti - score of 2.703 - U$ 1.864
The pattern that we find is that there is a strong correlation between the International Property Right Index scores and the GDP per capita figures. This is consistent with the findings in other similar rankings such as the Global Competitiveness Report, published by the World Economic Forum, and the Economic Freedom Index, published by the Heritage Foundation.
What can be interpreted is that property rights, and the strong enforcement of those property rights promote economic development and growth. This is because the protection of private property stimulates human action. For example, the United States has a strong judiciary, and rule of law. In this country, people can invest their money in a project with the certainty that those invesments will not be expropriated by an arbitrary judiciary. This promotes development because investing leads to higher economic output.
Those same incentives do not exist in countries that do not enforce property rights, and that is one of the main reasons why they are poor.
Answer:
c. the trade balance and the exchange rate.
Explanation:
An Open Economy is an economy that allows the free inflow and outflow of goods, services, capital and people. The opposite of a closed economy.
What sets these two models apart is that in an open economy, both imports and exports are allowed, so that countries necessarily have to trade in more than one currency, so the exchange rate must be examined. In addition, business transactions are recorded in a balance of payments. So these are the two concepts that are not tried in a closed economy analysis, but are introduced in an open economy.
Answer:
1. False
2. Shortage; Larger
Explanation:
1. A binding price ceiling is one that prevents the market from reaching its equilibrium. In this market, the equilibrium price is $25 therefore anything below $25 will be binding. A price ceiling below $25 per box is a binding ceiling.
2<em>. Assuming that the long-run demand for oranges is the same as the short-run demand, you would expect a binding price ceiling to result in a </em><em><u>shortage</u></em><em> that is </em><em><u>larger</u></em><em> in the long run than in the short run.</em>
In the long run, supply is more sensitive because farmers can decide to plant oranges on their land, to plant something else, or to sell their land altogether.
This means that a price ceiling in the long run will be less attractive to farmers so they might leave the market. If they do this then the shortage will be more as there are now less supplies in the market.
