In addition to Hitler's masterful rhetoric the Treaty of Versailles being used to tear Germany down some historians include the actual terms of surrender<span />
I believe the three terms you are looking for is diplomatic, military, and economic ways.
Everyone has their own opinions. It's one of the things that make us, as humans, great. However due to the fact that we have the right to have an opinion it also means that there will almost certainly be someone who disagrees. This means that even a monument that appeals to the majority of people will always have that group that disagrees with it. For example Holocaust monuments are accepted worldwide. We, as a planet, know that the Holocaust was a terrible event. However, even in today's world, there are those that disagree and find these monuments unacceptable. It may seem bizarre but it is something that happens everyday.
The compromise of 1850 contradicted the Missouri Compromise of 1820 by creating a free state south of 36°30'N. According to the Missouri Compromise, Missouri would enter as a slave state, Maine would join as a free state, and slavery would be prohibited in any new state north of Missouri's southern border, 36°30'N latitude
Answer:
Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X were very significant during the Civil Rights Movement. Both were excellent speakers and shared a goal but had two different ways of fixing the issue. Martin Luther King Jr. chose to fix the issues by using non-violence to create equality amongst all races to accomplish the goal. Malcolm X also wanted to decrease discrimination and get of segregation but by using another tactic to successfully accomplish the similar goal. The backgrounds of both men were one of the main driven forces behind the ways they executed their plans to rise above the various mistreatments. Martin Luther King Jr. was a more pronounced orator, a more refined leader, and overall saw the larger picture than Malcolm X.
Explanation:
