Answer:
Well you would obviously need a culture or more simply a people. Since their could be no empire without the people to "build" it. Then since I don't know who you are or tour personality, you need leadership skills, stewardship skills, and martial skills. Which these three compliment each other as one is overall leadership and the others focus on economics and warfare. However, you could build a cultural empire simply through a religion as, for example, the Catholic religion has done. Either way you would have to identify yourself as the head of your culture/ cultural empire.
Explanation:
Answer:
Union morale was low after its many losses, and victories would raise that morale.
Explanation:
The Western Theatre of the Civil War refers to the military operations that took place in the states of Alabama, Georgia, Florida, Mississippi, North Carolina, Kentucky, South Carolina and Tennessee. The Western Theatre allowed Union troops to have direct access to the most productive regions of the South, which were also harder for the Confederacy to defend, as they were far from the most populated areas. This advantage allowed the Union to enjoy a series of important victories, which raised morale among the troops.
It is based around a king.
<span>Bacon's Rebellion was an armed rebellion in 1676 by Virginia settlers led by Nathaniel Bacon against the rule of Governor William Berkeley. The colony's dismissive policy as it related to the political challenges of its western frontier, along with other challenges including leaving Bacon out of his inner circle, refusing to allow Bacon to be a part of his fur trade with the Native Americans, and Doeg tribe Indian attacks, helped to motivate a popular uprising against Berkeley, who had failed to address the demands of the colonists regarding their safety.</span>
Answer:
It is likely that Rawls claimed that there is no certainty in the statement that you deserve the wealth that you have and that it was acquired through the exploitation of your own talents. This, therefore, is a doubtful statement and must be carefully evaluated.
Explanation:
John Rawls was not in favor of the idea that individuals who use their talents to generate their income are worthy of all their income. That's because For Rawls, the money these individuals get is not, in fact, generated by the talent they have, but by the demand that society imposes on these talents. Therefore, these individuals owe a debt to the society for which they work. This debt must be paid by taxing their income. This taxation will generate the resources that will pay the society that benefits these individuals.
