They could change for many reasons some being:
1. if you're not on a lease the rent can go up at any time only
2. if you are on a lease regardless improvements to your home the landlord can raise it every year.
3. if you have a mortgage w a variable APR your mortgage/ housing needs change monthly
4. your goals would change if maybe you wanted to move closer to your job or you got a new job and you need to move closer
5. maybe if you got married or had kids your housing gold would change.
6. maybe you live in not such a nice neighborhood and you'd like to live in a neighborhood less crime your goals would change
not sure if those are the answers you're looking for but there's so many different reasons that your housing needs and goals could change
Incomplete question. The options:
a. green marketing
b. effect-related marketing
c. cause-related marketing
d. relationship marketing
Answer:
<u>c. cause-related marketing</u>
Explanation:
Note, a marketing effort that is centered primarily on making an impact or a said cause; usually, it involves a mutually benefiting agreement, in which a corporation would collaborate with a non-profit such that
- the corporation benefits (maybe in terms of sales), and
- the non-profit benefits in terms of fulfilling a cause.
The idea is that consumers would be drawn if they see that when they pay for a particular service or product, they will be contributing to a good cause.
Answer:
Company should load 1,479.9 motorcycles on each truck.
Explanation:
Cost per trip = $1,000
Demand for motorcycles = 300 per day
Cost per engine = $500
Holding cost = 20% of $500
= $100
Assuming that company plant works for 365 days in a year,
Annual demand = 300 motorcycles × 365 days
= 109,500 motorcycles
where,
D = Annual demand in units
S = Set up cost per order
H = Handling cost per order
= 1,479.9
Thus, the company should load 1,479.9 motorcycles on each truck.
Answer:
The correct answer is False.
Explanation:
This statement is false, since the residual theory of dividends argues that these are irrelevant, that is, that the value of the company is not affected by its dividend policy. The main drivers of this theory are Modigliani and Miller. Both authors affirm that the value of the company is determined solely by the profitability and the degree of risk of its assets (investments), and that the way in which the organization divides its income between dividends and reinvestment does not have a direct effect on its value .
However, some studies show that significant changes in dividends affect the price of shares in the same direction, that is, increases in dividends translate into increases in stock prices, and vice versa. In response, M and M propose that the positive effects of dividend increases be attributed, not to the dividend itself, but to the informational content of dividends with respect to future income. Thus, any increase in dividends would cause investors to raise the price of the shares, while a decrease would cause a corresponding decrease in the price of the shares.
