The answer is argument. :)
Hi there!
One such reason is the fact that the UN's job is to maintain peace and help other countries. If the president went to them, he can see what they think the best option is, being as they are not just apart of the US, and their main objective is to help other countries!
Hope this helps!
Answer:
Type of Adjusment - Status of accounts before adjustment
- Prepaid Expense – Asset Overstated
- Accrued Revenue – Asset Understated
- Accrued Expense – Expense Understated
- Unearned Revenue - Liability Overstated
Explanation:
1. Prepaid Expenses: These expenses paid in advance are considered as an Asset, so they give the right to enjoy a service equivalent to the amount paid in advance. This account is of debtor origin, are debited when an expense is paid in advance, they are credited when the expense paid in advance is consumed.
2. Accrued revenues: income that has been obtained but that at the end of the accounting period has not been collected. The principle is to apply and account for the income from the moment of commitment and consider an inflow of funds for accounting purposes even if it has not been collected.
3. Accrued expenses payable are items of expenditure that have not been recorded or paid and that represent a liability at the end of the period in which it was incurred
4. Unearned Revenue is an unearned service income is an obligation, it is recognized as a current liability.
<em>The understated amounts</em><em> indicate a reported amount as having a lesser balance that it actually does.</em><em> </em><em>On the other hand, </em><em>an overstated amount </em><em>indicates a reported amount as having a bigger balance than actually does
</em>
<em>
</em>
Emmett Louis was a 14-year-old African American who was lynched in Mississippi in 1955, after being accused of offending a white woman in her family's grocery store.
Answer:
that statement is false
Explanation:
At that time, the government created a policy to limit maximum products that can be produced by farmers in order to protect the price in the market. Filburn argue that the government had no power to do that to him and other farmers. The court stated that since the government had the right to regulate commerce, setting up maximum product quota also falls under the government's responsibility.
