Answer:
proactive; retroactive
Explanation:
Proactive interference: The term proactive interference refers to the process when an individual's old memories hinder him or her from retaining new memories.
Retroactive interference: The term retroactive interference refers to the process when an individual's new memories hinder him or her from retaining old memories. In other words, the new memories of a person disrupts the old memories.
In the question above, Katie is experiencing proactive interference, whereas Laurel is experiencing retroactive interference.
You forgot your options, but I think i've seen this question somewhere already and i remember them. The answer is that it is not true that <span>Iron could be manufactured without the need to heat it up. </span>
Efficacy is getting matters. it's far the potential to produce a desired amount of the desired effect or fulfillment in attaining a given intention. efficiency is doing things in the maximum low-priced manner. it's far the ratio of the output to the inputs of any device (appropriate input to output ratio).
Efficacy and effectiveness are close enough which means that they're regularly used interchangeably in contexts. however, effectiveness is regularly extra especially used inside the context of the way something accomplishes an assignment while efficacy conveys the quantity to which something accomplishes its task in any respect.
Learn more about efficacy here:
brainly.com/question/10575222
#SPJ4
The correct location on a place on the Earth is shown by using the meridians and the parallels.
The meridians are the vertical lines that are stretching from one pole to another, while the parallels are the horizontal lines that start from the Equator and make imaginary circles around the Earth in northern and southern direction. With the use of this two, we have the longitude and latitude at hand, so with a basic knowledge of cartography, every place can be located precisely on the surface of the Earth.
Answer:
a source of contamination
Explanation:
industrial and organizational psychology describes evaluation of behaviour with physical attractiveness in mind as a source of contamination. This is demonstrated in Criterion Contamination which refers to the degree to which performance appraisals may contain misleading elements that cause detraction from the unbiased and accurate assessment of an individual for a job role and his effectiveness in this role. Criterion contamination is caused by appraiser's biases and also from extraneous factors.
