Answer:
INCREASE the consumption of Pepsi and REDUCE the consumption of Hamburger
Explanation:
Based on the information given we were told that Bill uses his whole budget to purchase the following :
5 cans of Pepsi
3 Hamburgers per week
And the following were the price:
Pepsi costs $1 per can
Hamburger cost $2
Bill marginal utility:
Pepsi 4
Hamburgers 6
Based on the above details this means that Bill could increase his utility by INCREASING Pepsi consumption and REDUCING hamburger consumption reason been that 5 cans of Pepsi costs $1 per can which will gives us income of $5 ($5×1) while 3 Hamburgers per week cost $2 which will give us income of $6 ($3×2) which typically means that the Hamburgers has more income that Pepsi.
Secondly since the marginal utility for Pepsi is 4 while that of Hamburgers is 6 which means that Hamburgers has higher MARGINAL UTILITY than that of Pepsi because the consumption of Hamburgers is higher than the consumption of Pepsi.
Therefore the best thing that Bill could do in order to increase his Pepsi utility is for Bill to increase Pepsi consumption and reduce hamburger consumption.
Answer:
A partnership's allocations of income and deductions to the partners are required to be proportionate to the partners' percentage ownership of partnership profits in order to meet the substantial economic effect tests.
True
Explanation:
Equity and equality must be put in place as a yardstick to allocate such which would bring a common ground for both parties.
Answer:
If there are two lawyers with similar experience and fees, you should make a decision by asking other lawyers for recommendations.
The answer that would best complete the given statement above would be option A. It is the LAW OF SUPPLY that states that businesses will produce more products when they can sell them at higher prices. On the other hand, the law of demand<span> states that buyers will want more products when prices are low. Hope this answers your question.</span>
