In Hardin's Tragedy of the Commons, he states that if everybody acts on his or her self-interest there might be a collapse in population. As an example, if some people add more cattle into a public space to increase their gains, the soil would not be good for the cattles anymore. Or if some people, who earn more than others, have more children it would also bring the state of collapse.
Hardin refutes the "invisible hand" that states that people are free to increase their gains in an individual way so it can bring more profits to society. Because if they are also free to breed more, there wouldn't be any benefits to others. So what Hardin proposes is that people should be coerced if they have more children and that they should be more controled by the state.
Nowadays it is known better opinions about this matter and what Hardin suggested is overpast.
I can't answer this question if you dont show the paragraphs. That's like me asking you how many cookies are in a cookie jar but the jar is glued closed.
Jane Austen uses Omniscient Narration to highlight her characters'
traits in Pride and Prejudice. The book is generally narrated by the
third person or as Elizabeth. But it allows the reader to study the
characters by what they do, what others say about their endeavors and
how they act in the presence of the other characters.
Answer:
from imperative to conditional
Explanation:
the author describes Johnny Cade as a little puppy who has been mistreted several times and lost at different hings