Primarily, there were clear differences in the objectives of the settlers and the objectives of the crown in establishing colonies in North America.
Thus, on the one hand, the settlers sought to establish a society where religious tolerance was the fundamental rule, and where individual freedoms and economic and political liberalism prevailed over conservatism and religious rigidity.
Meanwhile, the English crown had other objectives: by encouraging the relocation of settlers to North America, it promoted its mercantilist and expansionist project that would allow it to exploit the riches of the continent, and establish itself as the main power of its time.
Learn more in brainly.com/question/12475018
Answer:
<em>Building the house on the top of a hill, she became famous.</em>
Explanation:
The given sentences are two independent clauses that talk about a single noun/ pronoun (in this case). And to rewrite them, we need a change in the way the sentence is constructed, depending on what the requirement is.
With the need to start the sentence with "building", we can rewrite the given sentences as "building the house on the top of a hill, she became famous." This makes the first part a dependent clause, starting the sentence with a participial phrase and also a gerund "building", thus the need for a comma after "hill".
Thus, the new sentence will become
<em>Building the house on the top of a hill, she became famous.</em>
The dialogues with the correct phrases written in bold are as follows:
- Why don't you do some exercise this term? I'm sure you would like it.
- What do you suggest I am doing/do?
- Why don;t you take up running?
- But I haven't got any trainers.
- You could/may always but a new pair for yourself.
- They might be expensive. Have you got any other ideas?
- What about taking/take up hockey?
- Hockey balls are very hard. When/How about a game with a softer ball.
- I know!You could go along/to volley ball practice. it's in the gym every Wednesday evening. They have a lot of fun, so I hear.
- That sounds very tiring/tired. I think I'm staying/I'll stay at home instead.
- Let's go swimming!he pool is pen today from 2:00 until 4:00.
The bold words are the correct phrases that are to be used.
Answer:
The paradox in the last two lines, the couplet of the sonnet means that the lover is unable to see his lover during the day, for he has to stay awake and see unnecessary things. But when it's nighttime, he can clearly see her as bright as day for then, he will see her in his dreams when he closes his eyes.
The speaker feels helpless and devastated at not being able to see his beloved and longs for the nighttime when he can see her in his dreams again.
Explanation:
A paradox is when two contrasting things are juxtaposed, presenting the contrasting ideas within close quarters which can at times be even absurd. In this sonnet by William Shakespeare, the whole sonnet is full of paradoxes.
The paradox in Sonnet 43 by William Shakespeare shows how the lover feels about the absence of his beloved. He stated that the days are nights when he cannot see her while the nights are "bright days" for then, he can dream of her. This is an absurd assumption, for days cannot be nights and nights cannot be bright days in the literal sense. But when we think more deeply, we see that the speaker is talking in paradoxes to show his pain in not being able to see her during the day, for he has to open his eyes to look at insignificant things. But at night, he can see her in his dreams which is what he prefers more.
The speaker feels he is helpless in his situation of being not able to be with her or be able to see her. And even if he does, it's only in his dreams which can be torture for him, but something he prefers more than not seeing her at all.
