Answer: Higher; Comparative advantage
Explanation:
A country or a firm has a comparative advantage in producing a commodity if the opportunity cost of producing that commodity in terms of other commodities is lower than the other country or firm.
Opportunity cost is the benefit that is foregone for an individual by choosing one alternative over other alternatives available to him.
If the opportunity cost is lower for an individual then this will benefit him whereas if the opportunity cost is higher then this will not benefit the individuals.
Therefore,
United states's Opportunity cost of producing a pair of shoes = 
= 5 apples have to be foregone for producing a pair of shoes
Canada's Opportunity cost of producing a pair of shoes = 
= 2 apples have to be foregone for producing a pair of shoes
Hence, Canada has a comparative advantage in producing pairs of shoes because Canada's opportunity cost of producing a pair of shoes is lower than United states opportunity cost.
Answer:
No
Explanation:
Just why- why would you ask this?
It is compute the dilutes earnings per share. I think it’s B.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "A": Mary Beth grows cotton. She finds that she can always sell her entire crop at the market price. However, if she asks a price that is even slightly higher she cannot sell any of her cotton.
Explanation:
Perfect Competition is a market where competition is at the highest degree possible. Perfect competitive markets have the following characteristics:
- <em>All companies sell the same goods or services. </em>
- <em>All companies are price takers. </em>
- <em>All firms have relatively small market shares. </em>
- <em>Buyers have full product and price information. </em>
- <em>The industry is characterized by low or no barriers to entry and exit of the industry.</em>
<em />
Thus, <em>in Mary Beth's case, she cannot ask for a different price than the one of the market because in a perfectly competitive market it is controlled by supply and demand. Companies cannot set the price.</em>
When a small business owner has two employees but trusts each one to have their own cash register and handle the money of the business separately, that means that the owner supports the establishment of responsibility. One instance where this could happen is at a small deli or coffee shop.
