3 years ago

Is infant circumcision ethically necessary?

1 answer:

6 0

The answer is that infant circumcision is not ethically necessary. The reason to this is that there are no proof of evidence as to why it is ethically necessary for it to be done to an infant. It is also because other medical professionals thinks that doing circumcision in an infant will create issues in terms of their health, producing complications. That is why it is not ethically necessary for it to be done on an infant.

You might be interested in

Glucose labeled with 14C in C-3 and C-4 is completely converted to acetyl-CoA via glycolysis and the pyruvate dehydrogenase comp

Morgarella [4.7K]

Answer:

The correct answer is option d.

Explanation:

The production of Acetyl-CoA takes place by the dissociation of both carbohydrates and lipids in the process of glycolysis and beta-oxidation. It then moves into the TCA cycle in the mitochondria and combines with oxaloacetate to give rise to citrate.

In the given case, no labeling will be found in the acetyl-CoA. The labeled C3 and C4 carbon of glucose signify the carboxyl carbon of pyruvate. In the succeeding reactions of the transformation of pyruvate to acetyl-CoA, the carboxyl carbon gets lost in the form of carbon dioxide. Thus, acetyl-CoA does not comprise any labeled C3 and C4 of glucose.

5 0

3 years ago

Think about the process of cellular respiration. While there are several products of

blagie [28]

Answer:

i would think to glucose

Explanation:

yep

3 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Newborn infants were given either smooth or knobby pacifiers to suck. They were later allowed to look at both types of pacifiers