Answer:
It is D providing thesis that it is supported with reliable evidence
Explanation:
Critics of the Articles of Confederation argued that it was far too "weak" in the sense that it didn't give the federal government enough power over the states. This became especially evident after Shays' Rebellion, which proved very difficult to put down.
The English turned down the plan because they feared that it would giver more power to the colonies. The colonies disliked it because they felt skeptical about central taxing.
No the freedom of a group of people should not cause the other set of people to have less freedom.
<h3>What is the declaration of independence?</h3>
This is the article that talked about the reason why the colonists wanted to be away from the leadership of the English people in the colonies. It talked about the issues that the people faced in the hands of Britain.
Freedom is supposed to be the universal right of all the people of the world but there are times that situations may exists that may cause some people to act like they are superior than other people.
For instance was during the colonial days, and the days that there was slavery in the United States.
The conclusion is that No the freedom of a group of people should not cause the other set of people to have less freedom.
Read more on the declaration of independence here:
brainly.com/question/9515546
#SPJ1
