Although I haven't actually read the article, I can obviously predict that the author is AGAINST terrorism.
I agree with this claim. The point of terrorism isn't to kill people, it is to get a political vantage point. Often times, it is used to spread a specific ideology, and can also be in used in a way to create fear in the population. It isn't expected of a society to retaliate so massively, to a terrorist attack. Terrorist attacks, are a way to be AGGRESSIVELY put society into fear, and this gives them an advantage in terms of political and economic negotiations.
A quipu, or knot-record<span> (also called khipu), was a method used by the </span>Incas<span> and other ancient Andean cultures to </span>keep records<span> and communicate information.</span>
Answer:
five years in the Middle East and North Africa, as populations demand more from 12 percent in 1981 to only 2 percent in 2005, although upheaval undoubtedly the Gulf countries, limiting their ability to bail out strategically critical countries like Their needs are of interest to the rest of the region's Arab populations:
Explanation:
np
Woah no way I did this for my history day project but any way it was xi’an
Answer:
A. Leaders had very little experience with self-government.
Explanation:
The Latin American Revolutions refers to the series of rebellions that arose in Latin America in the early 1810s opposing Spanish rule. It was mainly a consequence of the Ottoman invasion of Spain in 1809 during the Ottoman Wars.
The ideals of emancipation that sparked the revolutions were set aside as rich whites of Spanish ancestry (Creole) scrambled to grab the riches left behind by the colonial rulers and this resulted in a rule of despotism instead of law.