A good meeting must always be agenda-oriented, systematic, necessary people should only be the invitees and many more.
<h3>What is a good meeting?</h3>
A good meeting must be systematic, agenda-oriented, positive, and energetic. although it's very difficult to achieve a good meeting. The participants should be well prepared for the meeting. It should lead to decisions.
The criteria are necessary for every good meeting are:
- should have a detailed agenda
- necessary people should only be the invitees
- the members of the meeting should respect each other.
Therefore, option b aptly describes the criteria for every good meeting.
Learn more about the good meeting here:
brainly.com/question/13897604
Sandra earns $22,000 per year. Her earnings put her in the 20% tax rate. What is her tax owed? We can easily rephrase the question: what is 20% of 22000? 20% is actually one firth, so we can divide 22000 by 5. First, 20 000 by 5 is 4000 and 2000 by 5 is 400. We sum it up: 4000+400=4400, and that's the correct answer!
It is a governmental structure which reduces personal freedoms. It limits innovation. It encourages illegal activities. It eliminates the competition. It reduces communication. It reduces exports. It creates incentives that people don’t see as an incentive. Sorry I dont know how to do the drawing
Answer:
An incunable, or sometimes incunabulum (plural incunables or incunabula, respectively), is a book, pamphlet, or broadside printed in Europe before the 16th century. Incunabula are not manuscripts, which are documents written by hand. As of 2014, there are about 30,000 distinct known incunable editions extant, but the probable number of surviving copies in Germany alone is estimated at around 125,000. Through statistical analysis, it is estimated that the number of lost editions is at least 20,000. Around 550,000 copies of around 27,500 different works have been preserved worldwide.
Explanation:
i hope this helps:)
I think you forgot the options, but i can give you some information that might be useful: the two are independent, but still, the federal courts can decide whether the state courts took their decisions according to the constitution.
