1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
zhuklara [117]
4 years ago
15

Give two reasons why people thought Jackson would be different from previous presidents.

History
2 answers:
SIZIF [17.4K]4 years ago
7 0

He was the first president from the West. He was the first president who came from the working class. He had a more limited education than previous presidents. Because of his direct campaigning, he had more support among “common men” than previous presidents. He disliked the power of the “Eastern aristocracy.”

viva [34]4 years ago
4 0
Jackson was a "common" oar humble man, he did not come from wealth and grew up without a father, this separated him from the previous presidents and made him stand out. Besides, Jackson was a pow during the revolutionary war, he was a war hero.
You might be interested in
The first man who reported about australia to europe was
marysya [2.9K]

Answer:

Willem Janszoon

Explanation:

I am 100%

8 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What country did the coronavirus start in?
jonny [76]

Answer:

wuhan, china :)

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What type of case does the supreme court hear, if it has been heard before another court
Alik [6]

It can hear any case that is worthy of advancing that high. Most start out in a circuit court.

6 0
4 years ago
What was the three-fifths compromise at the constitutional convention
IgorC [24]

Answer: B. only <em>three-fifths</em> of the enslaved population would be counted when calculating each state's representation in Congress.

The Three-Fifths Compromise was reached during the 1787 United States Constitutional Convention. The question was whether the slave population would count when determining a state total's population number, which would be used to determine the number of seats that each state would have in the House of Representatives.

The compromise that was reached was to count every three out of five slaves as a person for this purpose. It gave the Southern states a third more seats in Congress than if slaves had been ignored.




4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
5. What were the effects of the French and Indian War?
Mars2501 [29]

Answer:

1. War costs a lot of money. The country must pay for soldiers, supplies, weapons, etc.

2. Britain gains control of the Ohio Valley and other land the French claimed

3. The new “British” land in the West is full of unhappy Native Americans who just lost a war and some of their land.

Explanation:

7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Absolute chronology is most useful when emphasizing
    10·1 answer
  • Which is necessary for a society to be considered a civilization?
    9·2 answers
  • Which approach to foreign policy involves sending ambassadors to other countries?
    5·2 answers
  • As a result of the Berlin airlift the US was able to
    7·1 answer
  • Why was Marie Antoinette so unpopular with the French?
    15·1 answer
  • Who said land cannot be traded or signed away because the land is for all
    6·1 answer
  • Which they been accurately describes the migration from cities to suburbs in the 1950?
    7·1 answer
  • Which three countries formed the central powers
    13·1 answer
  • Why do you think the leaders of the newly independent "Gold Coast" changed the
    5·1 answer
  • The Prince is most concerned with:
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!