Explanation:
change or addition that becomes part of the written language of the Constitution itself through one of four methods set forth in the Constitution
Answer:
<u>A) If it weren’t for Francis Pizarro’s, the Inca Empire would have continued to expand and prosper.</u>
<u>Explanation:</u>
Consider, for example, we are told at the outset, <em>"When Spanish conquistador Francisco Pizarro landed in Peru in 1532, he found unimaginable riches. The Inca Empire was in full bloom." </em>
However, we were told that Pizarro captured and requested ransom from the last Inca emperor Atahualpa. What was the outcome? The text tells us, "Once Pizarro had executed the last emperor, the empire rapidly collapsed." This detail brings out the central idea of the text, that is, "If it weren’t for Francis Pizarro’s, the Inca Empire would have continued to expand and prosper."
Answer:
I’d say there isn’t always wind, but there isn’t an image or text of choices.
Explanation:
The citizens that attacked their black neighbors were rarely convicted in Southern states like Mississippi.
<h3>What is the reason?</h3>
Despite that slavery is abolished, the practice of heavily punishing discrimination against the black are held with light hand in the southern state which were known for their prowess for slaves before slave abolition.
Hence, the citizens that attacked their black neighbors were rarely convicted in Southern states like Mississippi.
Therefore, the Option B is correct
Read more about slave abolition
<em>brainly.com/question/7193378</em>
