Answer:
jniancun
Step-by-step explanation:
bhuybhubujb
dvvwdvwde
dvdv
64+(2x)=35(x-1)
expand
64+2x=35x-35
minus 2x from both sides
64=33x-35
add 35 to both sides
99=33x
divide both sides by 33
3=x
the number is 3
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Firstly, note that -2i really is just z = 0 + (-2)i, so we see that Re(z) = 0 and Im(z) = -2.
When we're going from Cartesian to polar coordinates, we need to be aware of a few things! With Cartesian coordinates, we are dealing explicitly with x = blah and y = blah. With polar coordinates, we are looking at the same plane but with angle and magnitude in consideration.
Graphing z = -2i on the Argand diagram will look like a segment of the y axis. So we ask ourselves "What angle does this make with the positive x axis? One answer you could ask yourself is -90°! But at the same time, it's 270°! Why do you think this is the case?
What about the magnitude? How far is "-2i" stretched from the typical "i". And the answer is -2! Well... really it gets stretched by a factor of 2 but in the negative direction!
Putting all of this together gives us:
z = |mag|*(cos(angle) + isin(angle))
= 2*cos(270°) + isin(270°)).
To verify, let's consider what cos(270°) and sin(270°) are.
If you graph cos(x) and look at 270°, you get 0.
If you graph sin(x) and look at 270°, you get -1.
So 2*(cos(270°) + isin(270°)) = 2(0 + -1*i) = -2i as expected.
Since jason is currently at 54 feet above sea level and David is 11 feet below sea level the add 11 plus 54 which would give you 65 feet is there distance of elevations
Answer:
w = 2, EF = 30 , FG = 42
Explanation:
We have EF = 5w + 20 and FG = 7w + 28
Since these points E, F and G are col-linear points we have.
EG = EF + FG
And given that EG = 72
So, EF+EG = 72
5w + 20 + 7w + 28 = 72
12w + 48 = 72
12 w = 24
w = 2
So EF = 5w + 20 = 5x2 + 20 = 30
FG = 7w + 28 = 7x2 + 28 = 42
