The author's claim is that students should have more recess time. That is the point he/she is trying to prove. "Without more recess time" means "if the students don't have more recess time." The answer is not 'will,' because the author is trying to prove that students are already struggling with their problems and won't get better unless they have more recess time. It is not 'might,' because that is still negative for their point that students should have more recess time to not struggle with their problems. It is 'shall continue to' because the author is proving that students are already struggling with problems and will continue to struggle without more recess time.
A logical fallacy is an error in reasoning: a conclusion is drawn (they quickly... get to work, because... another recess is coming) when there is no real proof of its argumentation. The use of the defective auxiliary Might removes the logical fallacy, because it expresses possibility
.
Mark Brainliest And Give Me 5 Stars And A Thanks! :)
<span>The excerpt tells the readers about racial prejudice in early 20th-century America is that </span>Racial prejudice had negative psychological effects on those who suffered its injustices. It can cause those problems within the mind of the person and it can affect its thinking.
As for the subjective ideal people tend to “sugar-coat” the truth or even flat out lie because they are afraid of the repercussions that could face them. Choosing the objective ethical ideal is best because it's the healthiest form of communication.
