If scientists made medicine to live forever with no strings attached then maybe I would take it. It depends on who it is handing me it, If it was a bad person then no but if they were good people then maybe, I would only do it if my parents told me to. Did you know Sonnet 65 is by William Shakespeare and is one of several poems that discusses time, aging, and what writing can and cannot do to fight against these forces? Shakespeare's central theme is the opposition between the transitory, delicate nature of beauty and the devastating effect on the beauty of mortality and its principal instrument, time. The opening questions seem rhetorical, indirectly arguing the poet's conviction that beauty is no match for aging and death. Again I wouldn't know what to do if doctors or scientists gave me random medicine then I don't know. I know if the medicine was important then my parents would give it to me not random scientists.
The archetype of the cruel tyrant, exemplified by Dionysius, affects the story because
Damon and Pythias is a Greek legend that tells the story of two friends who believe in truth, honesty, and loyalty. When faced to dead by the tyrant Dionysius, they don't doubt to maintain their principles and to be loyal to each other.
This is of course somewhat of a subjective question, but in general most would agree that Lincoln embodied forgiveness, unity, and a perseverance in the face of great danger. <span>
</span>
Answer:
Because of their own bias and prior understanding and knowledge. Hope I helped!
“Love can touch us one time.”
