Answer:
D. cognitive conflict
Explanation:
Cognitive conflict is a kind of conflict that arises due to someone who tends to provide information different from the one believed by the individual. Basically when one tries to alter the perception an individual has towards any kind of topic and that the belief is tried to be changed by providing extra information, then the individual might get into "cognitive conflict".
As the conflict does not result in any kind of permanent differences but rather just for that particular topic the individual feels to be in different opinion.
Answer:
A. An increase in demand and supply of this drug.
Explanation:
In this case, if marijuana were to decriminalized, demand would be skyrocket in the short-term. It will achieve equilibrium once it is set to be recreational use only.
The answer is adopting bylaws. In addition, unlike the articles of incorporation the bylaws are not public records and classically do not have to be gather in a line with any governmental unit. The bylaws will be accepted by the directors of the corporation at their first board meeting or accepted by the deed of incorporator and then accepted at the first board conference.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "C": Work in Process Inventory.
Explanation:
Work in Process Inventory is an asset in the company's Balance Sheet. It represents the accumulated cost of unfinished goods that are currently in the manufacturing process. Companies that manufacture large or customer-made items typically use a work in progress inventory system to record labor, raw material, and overhead.
Since Intel has a history of effectively transforming
R&D investment into income, the pro-forma version of the ration seems to be
of more significant. A company starting, for instance, would be unalike: its
track record would be much poorer and probabilities are that the criteria set
in place would not be as rough as Intel’s. Therefore, it appears that the significance
hinge on the kind of business: if future benefit is more of a doubt, then
R&D should be expensed. The contradictory is true if benefit is almost certain.
Intel also has the advantage of being very vibrant with its R&D objectives
and having exact, measurable standards. They note obviously what the funds are apportioned
to and what the end outcomes should be of the growth.
